<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for RCI ACTION COMMITTEE - BLOG</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rciaction.org/blog/index.php/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rciaction.org/blog</link>
	<description>Fighting to protect the international mandate, programs and autonomy of Radio Canada International</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 20:32:29 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Stop CBC from dismantling our transmitters to the world by Kai Ludwig</title>
		<link>http://rciaction.org/blog/2012/10/16/stop-cbc-from-dismantling-our-transmitters-to-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-23812</link>
		<dc:creator>Kai Ludwig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 20:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rciaction.org/blog/?p=1307#comment-23812</guid>
		<description>Has word already got around what just happened or still happens at Sackville?

As it is certainly well known the CBC kept relaying NHK World, KBS World and Voice of Vietnam only until the summer season was over this Saturday. But the control system at the apparently unmanned station still powered the transmitters up until at least today, 9:40 local time (have not seen later observations so far). The NHK feed still had program audio (picked up by Montréal master control from satellite I guess), the KBS feed only a test tone anymore and the Vietnam feed only the music loop which Babcock (who had arranged the Sackville transmissions for Vietnam) at its London master control puts on unused audio circuits.

This sloppiness can not even be considered a funny anecdote or welcome last reprive, since some of the former Sackville slots have been moved without changes to other transmission facilities (TDF French Guiana, WHR Furman/USA) and got ruined by these Sackville ghost transmissions for two nights in a row, at least so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has word already got around what just happened or still happens at Sackville?</p>
<p>As it is certainly well known the CBC kept relaying NHK World, KBS World and Voice of Vietnam only until the summer season was over this Saturday. But the control system at the apparently unmanned station still powered the transmitters up until at least today, 9:40 local time (have not seen later observations so far). The NHK feed still had program audio (picked up by Montréal master control from satellite I guess), the KBS feed only a test tone anymore and the Vietnam feed only the music loop which Babcock (who had arranged the Sackville transmissions for Vietnam) at its London master control puts on unused audio circuits.</p>
<p>This sloppiness can not even be considered a funny anecdote or welcome last reprive, since some of the former Sackville slots have been moved without changes to other transmission facilities (TDF French Guiana, WHR Furman/USA) and got ruined by these Sackville ghost transmissions for two nights in a row, at least so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Respected Canadian Senator Hugh Segal raises RCI issue in Senate by jeremy</title>
		<link>http://rciaction.org/blog/2012/10/26/respected-canadian-senator-hugh-segal-raises-rci-issue-in-senate/comment-page-1/#comment-23655</link>
		<dc:creator>jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2012 00:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rciaction.org/blog/?p=1353#comment-23655</guid>
		<description>ya bring back RCI right now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ya bring back RCI right now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on U.S. listener starts petition to save Sackville transmitters by Don Brundage</title>
		<link>http://rciaction.org/blog/2012/10/23/u-s-listener-starts-petition-to-save-sackville-transmitters/comment-page-1/#comment-23528</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Brundage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 14:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rciaction.org/blog/?p=1340#comment-23528</guid>
		<description>Why dismantle short wave facilities that are already in place?  

Should emergencies ever arise short wave is the perfect back up to the internet which could easily be compromised.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why dismantle short wave facilities that are already in place?  </p>
<p>Should emergencies ever arise short wave is the perfect back up to the internet which could easily be compromised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stop CBC from dismantling our transmitters to the world by Chuck Parone</title>
		<link>http://rciaction.org/blog/2012/10/16/stop-cbc-from-dismantling-our-transmitters-to-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-23377</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Parone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 22:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rciaction.org/blog/?p=1307#comment-23377</guid>
		<description>Hey Richard  Radio Australia gets into North America just fine even though don&#039;tt target us. 9.58 and 21.74 megs have been around for decades. Couple of new freq are 11.945 and 19 Megs. (yep 19.000000 )

These guys know what works when the going gets tough. And not just when it gets tough in the Pacific. Their CE wrote about the KISS principle for homeland broadcast disasters. http://www.mediauk.com/article/34214/am-radio-beats-a-smartphone-any-day 

Radio Japan just bought four new 250 kw shortwave transmitters so they are not stupid either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Richard  Radio Australia gets into North America just fine even though don&#8217;tt target us. 9.58 and 21.74 megs have been around for decades. Couple of new freq are 11.945 and 19 Megs. (yep 19.000000 )</p>
<p>These guys know what works when the going gets tough. And not just when it gets tough in the Pacific. Their CE wrote about the KISS principle for homeland broadcast disasters. <a href="http://www.mediauk.com/article/34214/am-radio-beats-a-smartphone-any-day" rel="nofollow">http://www.mediauk.com/article/34214/am-radio-beats-a-smartphone-any-day</a> </p>
<p>Radio Japan just bought four new 250 kw shortwave transmitters so they are not stupid either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stop CBC from dismantling our transmitters to the world by Richard Cuff</title>
		<link>http://rciaction.org/blog/2012/10/16/stop-cbc-from-dismantling-our-transmitters-to-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-23368</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Cuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 19:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rciaction.org/blog/?p=1307#comment-23368</guid>
		<description>@Karl Zuk, the CBC is not a business.  It is a public service broadcaster, a unique type of institution that deserves to exist as a unifying, national voice reflecting Canadian ideas, heritage, and culture.

I wouldn&#039;t trust a for-profit business with that charter.  The current status of for-profit radio in the USA should be proof positive of that!

What I find most distressing was that the Sackville site was the best way for shortwave to reliably reach eastern North America from outside the USA and thus not subject to Smith-Mundt censorship.

Countries like Canada that voluntarily give up their international voice are also giving up their stature on the world stage.

While I can certainly access the CBC via the Internet, it&#039;s my opinion that shortwave use needs to be a &quot;backup of last resort&quot; if nothing else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Karl Zuk, the CBC is not a business.  It is a public service broadcaster, a unique type of institution that deserves to exist as a unifying, national voice reflecting Canadian ideas, heritage, and culture.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t trust a for-profit business with that charter.  The current status of for-profit radio in the USA should be proof positive of that!</p>
<p>What I find most distressing was that the Sackville site was the best way for shortwave to reliably reach eastern North America from outside the USA and thus not subject to Smith-Mundt censorship.</p>
<p>Countries like Canada that voluntarily give up their international voice are also giving up their stature on the world stage.</p>
<p>While I can certainly access the CBC via the Internet, it&#8217;s my opinion that shortwave use needs to be a &#8220;backup of last resort&#8221; if nothing else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stop CBC from dismantling our transmitters to the world by Antonio Avelino</title>
		<link>http://rciaction.org/blog/2012/10/16/stop-cbc-from-dismantling-our-transmitters-to-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-23365</link>
		<dc:creator>Antonio Avelino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rciaction.org/blog/?p=1307#comment-23365</guid>
		<description>Prezados Senhores da CBC,

Não destruam o parque de transmissão de Ondas Curtas de Sackville, porque mesmo com os avanços tecnológicos as Ondas Curtas ainda é um meio de transmissão segura e eficaz. Se não querem mais o parque o aluguem para outras emissoras que tem interesse em utilizar este meio.
Não destruam pois já é patrimônio cultural do povo canadense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prezados Senhores da CBC,</p>
<p>Não destruam o parque de transmissão de Ondas Curtas de Sackville, porque mesmo com os avanços tecnológicos as Ondas Curtas ainda é um meio de transmissão segura e eficaz. Se não querem mais o parque o aluguem para outras emissoras que tem interesse em utilizar este meio.<br />
Não destruam pois já é patrimônio cultural do povo canadense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stop CBC from dismantling our transmitters to the world by Alan</title>
		<link>http://rciaction.org/blog/2012/10/16/stop-cbc-from-dismantling-our-transmitters-to-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-23348</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 13:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rciaction.org/blog/?p=1307#comment-23348</guid>
		<description>I am a listener to CBC in Africa, and work with Shortwave radio broadcasting in Africa. CBC may not target where I live, but I can hear it sometimes.

No other medium is as efficient at mass communication, or as reliable. Internet connections are far more easily compromised than any of us may believe. 

Shortwave radio, as was demonstrated during the cold war, is almost impossible to block or jam, even with the best of technology and efforts. 

DRM (digital shortwave) makes analog shortwave sound like FM radio and would increase its usefulness significantly. Sackville was doing some phenomenal DRM broadcasts, but dropped them all. 

An efficient and sophisticated shortwave transmission site installation like Sackville is a public investment and resource that should not be dismantled like yesterday&#039;s sweaty shirt or last year&#039;s government. The government should not waste the investment that has been made over many decades by destroying it. If it is not a priority at this time, at least preserve its usefulness for the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a listener to CBC in Africa, and work with Shortwave radio broadcasting in Africa. CBC may not target where I live, but I can hear it sometimes.</p>
<p>No other medium is as efficient at mass communication, or as reliable. Internet connections are far more easily compromised than any of us may believe. </p>
<p>Shortwave radio, as was demonstrated during the cold war, is almost impossible to block or jam, even with the best of technology and efforts. </p>
<p>DRM (digital shortwave) makes analog shortwave sound like FM radio and would increase its usefulness significantly. Sackville was doing some phenomenal DRM broadcasts, but dropped them all. </p>
<p>An efficient and sophisticated shortwave transmission site installation like Sackville is a public investment and resource that should not be dismantled like yesterday&#8217;s sweaty shirt or last year&#8217;s government. The government should not waste the investment that has been made over many decades by destroying it. If it is not a priority at this time, at least preserve its usefulness for the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stop CBC from dismantling our transmitters to the world by Robin Spalding</title>
		<link>http://rciaction.org/blog/2012/10/16/stop-cbc-from-dismantling-our-transmitters-to-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-23326</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Spalding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 08:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rciaction.org/blog/?p=1307#comment-23326</guid>
		<description>Killing off Short-Wave is a very short-sighted idea.  It&#039;s one thing to scale back broadcasts (not good, IMHO) but to completely destroy the means of operating on SW is almost criminal - you&#039;re completely dismissing the millions who depend on SW for news, information &amp; culture from Canada in the parts of the world not blessed with broadband Internet access - and leaving those with such access vulnerable to their governments&#039; internal control of Internet.  (Think China, or the Middle East, or any number of other places.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Killing off Short-Wave is a very short-sighted idea.  It&#8217;s one thing to scale back broadcasts (not good, IMHO) but to completely destroy the means of operating on SW is almost criminal &#8211; you&#8217;re completely dismissing the millions who depend on SW for news, information &amp; culture from Canada in the parts of the world not blessed with broadband Internet access &#8211; and leaving those with such access vulnerable to their governments&#8217; internal control of Internet.  (Think China, or the Middle East, or any number of other places.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stop CBC from dismantling our transmitters to the world by Mike Terry</title>
		<link>http://rciaction.org/blog/2012/10/16/stop-cbc-from-dismantling-our-transmitters-to-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-23322</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 07:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rciaction.org/blog/?p=1307#comment-23322</guid>
		<description>Shortwave is so important for informing the world across boundaries, its tragic that this is happening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shortwave is so important for informing the world across boundaries, its tragic that this is happening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stop CBC from dismantling our transmitters to the world by Richard Clifford</title>
		<link>http://rciaction.org/blog/2012/10/16/stop-cbc-from-dismantling-our-transmitters-to-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-23278</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Clifford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 17:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rciaction.org/blog/?p=1307#comment-23278</guid>
		<description>This is stupid!  What&#039;s going to happen to international broadcasters who want to reach North America, especially Radio Japan and Radio Australia?  I want this action stopped!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is stupid!  What&#8217;s going to happen to international broadcasters who want to reach North America, especially Radio Japan and Radio Australia?  I want this action stopped!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.328 seconds -->
